Where Information Lives

EMC Journal

Subscribe to EMC Journal: eMailAlertsEmail Alerts newslettersWeekly Newsletters
Get EMC Journal: homepageHomepage mobileMobile rssRSS facebookFacebook twitterTwitter linkedinLinkedIn

EMC Journal Authors: William Schmarzo, Research N Reports, Mat Mathews, Bruce Popky, Cloud Best Practices Network

Related Topics: EMC Journal, Travel Tips

Blog Feed Post

Design Thinking: How User Experiences Change User Expectations

The problem with living in a rapidly changing world is that things are always changing. But as Yogi Berra (famous Hall of Fame baseball catcher for the New York Yankees and occasional American philosopher) said: “You can observe a lot by just watching.”

Well, more than watching, we are living in this fast changing world. And nothing impacts our expectations more than our own personal experiences. Whether you are using Amazon for your shopping needs…

Design Thinking Amazon

…or Netflix for your viewing pleasure…

Netflix Design Thinking

…or eHarmony for whatever you use eHarmony for…

eHarmony Design Thinking

…everyone seems to have a recommendation as to what you should buy, view, listen, vacation, drive, date, sit, turn and eat next! These firsthand personal experiences are shaping the world of Big Data, data science and application development by changing the expectations of our business stakeholder and customer communities. Your business stakeholders don’t want reports and charts, even impressive and swirling dynamic ones. They want highly relevant business recommendations that help them do their jobs better. And your customers want highly-personalized, highly-relevant recommendations that first and foremost look out for what’s important to them. That means that successful data science teams need to not only know the latest data science techniques, but also need to become more fluent and literate in the art of design thinking so that organizations can deliver on these changing expectations.

Role of Design Thinking For a Data Scientist

I have written previously about how design thinking can unleash an organization’s creative thinking capabilities (see “Can Design Thinking Unleash Organizational Innovation?”). Building predictive and prescriptive analytic models is not sufficient in a world where our users personal experiences have dramatically changed their engagement expectations.

As a refresher, Design Thinking is “building a deep empathy with the people you’re designing for; generating tons of ideas; building a bunch of prototypes; sharing what you’ve made with the people you’re designing for; and eventually putting your innovative new solution out in the world[1].”

Figure 1 shows the Design Thinking process as taught by Stanford’s Design School (d.school).

Figure 1: Stanford d.school Design Thinking

Figure 1: Stanford d.school Design Thinking

My design thinking cohort in crime, John Morley, is doing some innovative thinking in this space (see his recent blog “A Blueprint for Better Program Design”). John, Leon Zhou from Google and I have been discussing the linkage between design thinking and machine learning. I love how the chart below, a bit of an eye test, brings these two seemingly disparate disciplines into alignment (see Figure 2).

Figure 2: Mapping Design Thinking to Machine Learning

Figure 2: Mapping Design Thinking to Machine Learning

Let’s drill into the graphic a bit more, and try to understand the explicit, actionable integration points between design thinking and machine learning (see Table 1).

Design Thinking

Machine Learning

Integration Point



Understand use case, stakeholder requirements and key decisions. Document environment (challenges, inhibitors) within which those decisions must be executed.




Define hypotheses and how the analytic results will be used/rendered within the context of the work or user environment.

(Customer Journey Map and Storyboards)



Envision the realm of what’s possible. Leverage small use case-specific data sets. Brainstorm variables and metrics that might be better predictors of performance.

(Vision Workshop)



Test different variables, transformations, enrichments and analytic approaches.  Collaborate with stakeholders on user experience and engagement ramifications. Fail fast / learn faster.

(Mockups and Prototypes)



Test in real world. Measure model/decision effectiveness. Seek feedback. Embrace agile application development approach.

(Proof of Value)

Table 1:  Integrating Design Thinking and Machine Learning

Linking Design Thinking and Machine Learning is really not that hard, if we think about these two disciplines from the perspective of trying to optimize stakeholder and customer decisions. The business stakeholder and customer decisions drive alignment between the 5 Design Thinking and Machine Learning stages:

  • Emphasize/Understand Stage: Define the decisions that support the use case and understand the challenges and impediments to those decisions from the perspective of the stakeholders and customers.
  • Define/Synthesize Stage: Define the hypotheses for the decisions and understand the environment (e.g., decision latency, quality, granularity) in which the decisions will be rendered in a way that is both actionable and measurable.
  • Ideate/Ideate: Brainstorm the variables and metrics that might be better predictors of decision performance.
  • Prototype/Tuning: Test and fine-tune the analytic models across the wide range of potential variables, transformations, enrichments and analytic algorithms.
  • Test/Validate: Measure model goodness of fit and ultimately, the effectiveness of the decisions; use the decision results to update and fine-tune the analytic models, and stakeholder and customer engagement environment.

Changing Personal Experiences Create Business Model Opportunities

Changing customer expectations open up new business model opportunities. Think how Uber and AirBnB have changed our personal experiences with respect to car transportation and house sharing, or how Amazon has changed our personal experiences with respect to product selection and delivery, or how Netflix has changed our personal experiences with respect to on-demand entertainment. These changing personal experiences are the source of business model disruption and customer disintermediation.

And these changing personal experiences come back to one common denominator – how we make decisions. Decisions about what to buy, or how to get to our next destination, or what to watch.

If your data science and design thinking capabilities aren’t in total alignment around identifying, understanding, validating, prioritizing, optimizing and rendering recommendations to these decisions, then you just might miss being the next Uber or Netflix.

[1] http://www.designkit.org/human-centered-design

The post Design Thinking: How User Experiences Change User Expectations appeared first on InFocus Blog | Dell EMC Services.

Read the original blog entry...

More Stories By William Schmarzo

Bill Schmarzo, author of “Big Data: Understanding How Data Powers Big Business” and “Big Data MBA: Driving Business Strategies with Data Science”, is responsible for setting strategy and defining the Big Data service offerings for Dell EMC’s Big Data Practice.

As a CTO within Dell EMC’s 2,000+ person consulting organization, he works with organizations to identify where and how to start their big data journeys. He’s written white papers, is an avid blogger and is a frequent speaker on the use of Big Data and data science to power an organization’s key business initiatives. He is a University of San Francisco School of Management (SOM) Executive Fellow where he teaches the “Big Data MBA” course. Bill also just completed a research paper on “Determining The Economic Value of Data”. Onalytica recently ranked Bill as #4 Big Data Influencer worldwide.

Bill has over three decades of experience in data warehousing, BI and analytics. Bill authored the Vision Workshop methodology that links an organization’s strategic business initiatives with their supporting data and analytic requirements. Bill serves on the City of San Jose’s Technology Innovation Board, and on the faculties of The Data Warehouse Institute and Strata.

Previously, Bill was vice president of Analytics at Yahoo where he was responsible for the development of Yahoo’s Advertiser and Website analytics products, including the delivery of “actionable insights” through a holistic user experience. Before that, Bill oversaw the Analytic Applications business unit at Business Objects, including the development, marketing and sales of their industry-defining analytic applications.

Bill holds a Masters Business Administration from University of Iowa and a Bachelor of Science degree in Mathematics, Computer Science and Business Administration from Coe College.